Working memory improvements following supramaximal high-intensity interval training predicted by increased prefrontal cortex activation and leg strength gains
Question
Do exercise-induced changes in cardiorespiratory fitness or leg strength explain changes in working-memory-related brain activation and working-memory performance after supramaximal HIT in older adults?
Summary
This fMRI substudy of the Umea HIT randomized trial examined non-exercising older adults assigned to supramaximal HIT or moderate-intensity cycling. In the MRI sample, HIT did not significantly outperform moderate training on working-memory change, but HIT showed within-group working-memory gains, and leg-strength gains predicted increased right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex activation, which predicted in-scanner working-memory improvement. The imaging results were exploratory and uncorrected.
Methodology
- MRI subsample of non-exercising older adults from the Umea HIT RCT.
- 43 participants.
- Stationary cycling.
- Work intervals: 6 s.
- Recovery: Not specified in this article.
- Intensity: Supramaximal watts above individual VO2peak wattage.
- 20 min.
- 2 sessions/week.
- 12 weeks.
- Task-based fMRI substudy of a randomized controlled trial comparing supramaximal HIT with moderate-intensity training.
- Offline working-memory composite, MRI working-memory composite, Working-memory brain activation, and VO2peak were tracked.
Outcomes
Working-memory performance
Between-group change was not significant in the MRI sample, but HIT improved within-group offline and MRI WM composites.
Offline WM group x time p=0.15; MRI WM p=0.07; HIT within-group p=0.034 and p=0.008.
Leg strength
HIT showed greater isometric leg-strength change than MIT and significant within-group improvement.
Between-group MD 0.08 Nm/kg, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.16, p=0.06; HIT within-group p=0.006.
VO2peak
Both groups improved VO2peak with no significant between-group difference.
Mean increase 1.49 ml/kg/min, 95% CI 0.76 to 2.21; between-group p=0.32.
fMRI activation mechanism
In HIT only, strength gains predicted increased right dlPFC activation, and dlPFC activation predicted in-scanner WM improvement; VO2peak did not predict activation.
Strength to dlPFC beta 0.87 p=0.022; dlPFC to performance beta 4.08 p=0.012; uncorrected fMRI threshold p<0.001.
Insights
- Cognitive benefit claims from HIIT should be conservative and mechanism-focused.
- Leg strength may be a relevant mediator, so combined HIIT plus lower-body strength programming is plausible.
- Exploratory fMRI findings should not be surfaced as definitive user-facing health claims.
Limitations
- Small MRI subsample
- Uncorrected exploratory fMRI analyses
- No significant between-group WM change in MRI sample
- No long-term follow-up
- Healthy and relatively well-educated older adults
Safety
- No adverse-event or injury data were reported in this article.
- Participants were screened for medical, cognitive, and MRI contraindications.