PMID 40487193

Research
All papers

(1)H NMR urinary metabolomic analysis in recreational athletes: Impact of physical exercise, high intensity interval training and whole body cryostimulation

Question

How do submaximal cycling, a 4-week HIIT program, and whole-body cryostimulation recovery affect urinary metabolomic profiles in recreational athletes?

Summary

This ancillary metabolomics study analyzed urine from 23 healthy recreational male athletes before and after a 2-hour submaximal cycling challenge, both before and after a 4-week HIIT program. Participants were randomized to whole-body cryostimulation after each HIIT session or passive recovery. HIIT and the cycling challenge altered urinary metabolites related to glycolysis, lipid metabolism, nucleotide turnover, and energy homeostasis; cryostimulation changed some metabolite patterns but the evidence is mechanistic and small-sample.

Methodology

  • Healthy male recreational athletes randomized to WBC or passive recovery.
  • 23 participants.
  • Cycling plus whole-body cryostimulation.
  • Work intervals: Not reported in this paper; eight intervals per session.
  • Recovery: WBC immediately after each training session.
  • Intensity: Workload corresponding to baseline power peak.
  • 3 sessions/week.
  • 4 weeks.
  • Ancillary randomized parallel-group metabolomics study
  • Urinary metabolites, Metabolic pathways, and Recovery technique were tracked.

Outcomes

SMC metabolites

Submaximal cycling changed lactate, adenine, urea, citrate, formate, alanine, and acetate patterns.

Targeted analyses reported multiple p<0.05 differences

Mixed

HIIT adaptation

Training amplified post-SMC metabolic alterations in both groups.

PCA and targeted metabolite analyses

Improved

WBC

WBC showed distinct changes in selected metabolites but did not affect lactate and adenine.

Acetone and 2-hydroxyisobutyric acid changed only in WBC; citrate changed only in CTL

Mixed

Insights

  • Metabolomic changes after HIIT and WBC are mechanistic signals, not direct proof of better recovery or performance.
  • Recovery modalities should be evaluated with user-relevant outcomes before app recommendation.
  • Incomplete interval details limit direct workout replication.

Limitations

  • Small all-male sample.
  • Ancillary sub-study of an earlier protocol.
  • Two CTL participants lacked end-procedure urine samples.
  • Pathway analysis was semi-quantitative and needs validation.
  • No adverse-event reporting or direct performance outcome emphasis.

Safety

  • Adverse events were not reported in this paper.
  • Participants were healthy male recreational athletes and cardiovascular risk factors associated with exercise and WBC were verified.
  • Two control participants did not provide urine samples at the end of the procedure, creating incomplete outcome data but not described as safety-related.