Effects of low-versus high-volume high-intensity interval training on glycemic control and quality of life in obese women with type 2 diabetes. A randomized controlled trial
Question
Does low-volume HIIT differ from high-volume HIIT for glycemic control, lipids, blood pressure, adiposity, cardiorespiratory fitness, and health-related quality of life in obese women with type 2 diabetes?
Summary
This randomized trial compared low-volume and high-volume treadmill HIIT with non-exercise care in obese women with type 2 diabetes. Both HIIT doses improved glycemic control, lipids, adiposity measures, systolic blood pressure, treadmill endurance, and quality of life versus control; the 4 x 4 min dose produced larger gains for glucose, triglycerides, LDL, and treadmill time, while the shorter 2 x 4 min dose produced several similar benefits with less time.
Methodology
- Obese women with type 2 diabetes on oral medication.
- 72 participants.
- Treadmill walking/jogging.
- Work intervals: 2 x 4 min.
- Recovery: 3 min active recovery at 65-75% peak HR.
- Intensity: 85-90% peak HR.
- 19 min.
- 3 sessions/week.
- 12 weeks.
- Randomized controlled parallel-group trial with low-volume HIIT, high-volume HIIT, and non-exercising control groups.
- HbA1c, fasting glucose, 2-hour postprandial glucose, Lipids, Blood pressure, and Adiposity were tracked.
Outcomes
Glycemic control
Both HIIT groups improved HbA1c, FBG, and 2-hour postprandial glucose versus baseline and control, with larger improvements after high-volume HIIT.
Between-group post values p<0.001 for glucose measures; high-volume superior to low-volume p<0.05.
Lipids
Both HIIT groups improved TC, TG, LDL, and HDL versus baseline/control; high-volume was superior for TG and LDL but not TC or HDL.
Reported p<0.05 for significant changes; TG and LDL favored high-volume.
Blood pressure, adiposity, HRQoL
Low- and high-volume HIIT produced similar improvements in TC, HDL, SBP, DBP except low-volume DBP, BMI, waist measures, and SF-12 scores.
No significant low- vs high-volume difference for these outcomes; low-volume DBP p>0.05.
Treadmill time to maximal exhaustion
Both HIIT groups improved fitness versus baseline/control; high-volume improved more than low-volume.
High-volume superiority p<0.05.
Insights
- A 2 x 4 min HIIT format may be a time-efficient clinical option when session time is a barrier.
- A 4 x 4 min format may be preferable when glycemic control and fitness are the main goals.
- Use screening and HR monitoring for people with diabetes.
Limitations
- No direct VO2max measurement
- No double blinding
- Limited assessor blinding
- Women-only obese diabetes sample
- No dietary records
- Medication dosage not modeled
- Hormonal status not controlled
Safety
- No unintended effects or harms were reported during or following training in either HIIT group.
- Participants with complications or exercise contraindications were excluded.