High-Intensity Interval Training in Female Adolescents with Moderate or Severe Obesity
Question
Do 12 weeks of high-intensity versus moderate-intensity interval cycling produce different anthropometric and biological effects in adolescent girls with moderate or severe obesity?
Summary
This randomized stratified trial compared moderate- and high-intensity interval cycling in 57 adolescent girls with moderate or severe obesity. All groups improved body-composition measures and insulin resistance, while the high-intensity groups showed larger insulin and HOMA-IR reductions and increased lean body mass. The moderate-obesity HIIT group had the strongest body-fat, growth hormone, and glucose responses.
Methodology
- Adolescent girls with moderate or severe obesity, BMI >=97th percentile and body fat >=30%.
- 57 participants.
- Cycle ergometer.
- Work intervals: 1 minute.
- Recovery: 2 minutes active recovery at 50% HR reserve; 4 minutes free pedaling between sets.
- Intensity: 85% HR reserve in weeks 1-4, 90% in weeks 5-8, 95% in weeks 9-12.
- About 35-41 minutes including warm-up, intervals, between-set recovery, and cooldown.
- 3 sessions/week.
- 12 weeks.
- Randomized stratified 2 x 2 intervention trial by obesity class and training intensity.
- Body composition, Growth hormone and glucose, Insulin resistance, and Blood lactate were tracked.
Outcomes
Anthropometry
All four groups reduced body mass, BMI, body fat percentage, and waist circumference; moderate-obesity HIIT had the largest percentage changes.
Post-intervention reductions p<0.05, most pronounced in MOG HI with p<0.01 and body fat change -7.52%.
Lean body mass
Only the HIIT groups significantly increased lean body mass.
MOG HI and SOG HI p<0.05.
Insulin and HOMA-IR
All groups improved insulin and HOMA-IR, with the largest reductions in HIIT groups.
Insulin changes: MOG HI -25.49%, SOG HI -25.34%; HOMA-IR: MOG HI -31.42%, SOG HI -28.88%; HIIT reductions p<0.01.
Growth hormone and glucose
Only the moderate-obesity HIIT group significantly improved growth hormone and blood glucose.
MOG HI GH and glucose p<0.05; GH correlated with body fat r=-0.76 and waist circumference r=-0.77; glucose correlated with body fat r=-0.72 and waist r=-0.82.
Blood lactate
Both HIIT groups significantly decreased blood lactate values.
MOG HI ES=0.56 and SOG HI ES=0.61; both p<0.05.
Insights
- For adolescent obesity, HIIT intensity progression may matter for insulin-resistance outcomes.
- Moderate and severe obesity groups may respond differently; severe obesity may need extra tolerance planning.
- HR reserve prescription and screening are central to this protocol.
Limitations
- Female-only sample.
- No non-exercise control group.
- Diet was not monitored daily during the intervention.
- Growth hormone was not measured at multiple times throughout the day.
- No detailed adverse-event reporting.
Safety
- Five initial candidates were excluded after safety/familiarization testing.
- Lower-body injury and cardiovascular/orthopedic dysfunction were exclusion criteria.
- No training adverse events were reported.