Proteolytic markers associated with a gain and loss of leg muscle mass with resistance training followed by high-intensity interval training
Question
Do proteolytic markers increase when resistance-training-induced vastus lateralis hypertrophy is lost after a subsequent 7-week treadmill HIIT block?
Summary
This secondary mechanistic analysis studied muscle biopsies from 11 untrained young men before training, after 7 weeks of resistance training, and after a subsequent 7 weeks of treadmill HIIT. The authors found that the previously observed loss of resistance-training-induced vastus lateralis size after HIIT coincided with higher proteolysis-related markers, but the paper provides limited HIIT protocol detail and does not report exercise safety or adherence outcomes.
Methodology
- Untrained college-aged men with complete vastus lateralis biopsies at PRE, MID, and POST.
- 11 participants.
- Resistance training, then treadmill HIIT.
- Intensity: High-intensity; exact HIIT target not reported.
- RT 2 days/week, then HIIT 3 days/week.
- 7 weeks RT plus 7 weeks HIIT.
- Secondary mechanistic pre-mid-post analysis of a single exercise sequence
- Proteolysis markers, Vastus lateralis size, and In vitro myotube response were tracked.
Outcomes
Atrogene mRNA
TRIM63, FBXO32, and FOXO3A were higher after HIIT than both baseline and post-RT.
POST vs PRE and MID p<0.05.
Proteasome markers
20S proteasome core abundance increased after HIIT; activity increased after RT and remained higher after HIIT.
20S core POST vs PRE p=0.031; POST vs MID p=0.049; activity MID and POST vs PRE p<0.05.
Calpain/autophagy
Calpain-2 and Beclin-1 increased at MID and POST, but interpretation as breakdown versus turnover was uncertain.
MID and POST vs PRE p<0.05 for calpain-2 and Beclin-1 protein levels.
In vitro MPS
IGF1+AICAR blunted IGF1-related myotube growth and had lower MPS proxy than IGF1 alone.
Myotube diameter p=0.017; puromycin/MPS proxy p<0.001.
Insights
- Do not use this paper as a direct HIIT workout template because interval details and safety outcomes are missing.
- For users focused on hypertrophy, this paper raises a hypothesis that switching from RT to HIIT may not maintain RT-induced muscle size in untrained men.
- The evidence is mechanistic and should not be framed as proof that HIIT alone causes muscle loss.
Limitations
- Small sample of 11 men
- Secondary analysis
- No control or comparator exercise group
- No nontraining post-RT control
- No in vivo muscle protein synthesis or breakdown measures
- Exact HIIT protocol not reported in this article
- No adverse-event or adherence reporting
Safety
- The article did not report adverse events, injuries, symptoms, adherence, or tolerability for the training intervention.
- Participants were screened to exclude cardiometabolic disease and conditions contraindicating exercise training or muscle biopsy.
- Hydration was checked before testing sessions using urine specific gravity <=1.020 as a threshold to continue testing.
- Repeated vastus lateralis biopsies were part of the study procedures, but biopsy complications were not reported.