Acute Cardiopulmonary Response of High-Intensity Interval Training with Elastic Resistance vs. High-Intensity Interval Training on a Treadmill in Healthy Adults
Question
How do acute cardiopulmonary, lactate, and perceived-exertion responses differ between elastic-resistance HIIT and treadmill HIIT in healthy adults?
Summary
In healthy active adults, a single elastic-resistance HIIT session produced higher overall heart-rate, ventilation, oxygen uptake, lactate, and perceived-exertion responses than a treadmill HIIT session matched to about 85% VO2max. Elastic-resistance HIIT reached the target cardiopulmonary zone earlier and for more bouts, but the study measured only acute responses.
Methodology
- Twenty-two healthy adults, 11 men and 11 women, mean age 27.6 years, BMI 18-25, physically independent and meeting at least 150 min/week of physical activity. Two additional recruits dropped out for personal reasons.
- 22 participants.
- Running forward and backward against elastic resistance.
- Work intervals: 10 x 1 min work bouts.
- Recovery: 1 min passive rest.
- Intensity: About 85% VO2max from elastic-resistance cardiopulmonary test, cadence 200 bpm.
- 3 min warm-up plus 20 min interval block.
- Single acute session.
- Acute crossover visit.
- Randomized acute crossover study
- Heart rate, VO2, Ventilation, and VCO2 and RER were tracked.
Outcomes
Cardiopulmonary load
Elastic-resistance HIIT showed higher overall peak and average HR, ventilation, VO2, VCO2, and perceived exertion than treadmill HIIT.
Target intensity
Elastic-resistance HIIT reached 80% VO2max by the second bout and maintained target intensity in 90% of bouts; treadmill HIIT reached it by the fourth bout and maintained it in 70% of bouts.
Bout peaks
When only exercise bouts were compared, peak values were not significantly different between modalities.
Perceived exertion
Elastic-resistance HIIT produced higher Borg and OMNI perceived exertion and reached moderate-to-hard ratings earlier.
Insights
- Elastic resistance can make short HIIT bouts reach high cardiopulmonary strain quickly.
- The same 1 min work / 1 min rest timing can feel harder depending on modality.
- Acute physiological intensity should not be mistaken for proven long-term training benefit.
Limitations
- Acute single-session study only.
- Healthy active young adults only.
- No chronic training adaptations or adherence outcomes.
- Sleep, caffeine, alcohol, and pre-test behavior were requested but not objectively verified.
Safety
- No accidents occurred during elastic-resistance cardiopulmonary testing; no other adverse events were reported. Participants were screened for several health risks.