PMID 36675569

Research
All papers

Comparing Post-Exercise Hypotension after Different Sprint Interval Training Protocols in a Matched Sample of Younger and Older Adults

Question

Do age and sprint-interval rest duration modulate post-exercise hypotension after SIT in matched younger and older adults?

Summary

This acute randomized crossover study tested two all-out cycling SIT protocols in matched younger and older trained adults. Four 30-second sprints with 3-minute active recoveries produced post-exercise hypotension in both age groups, while the same sprints with only 1-minute recoveries did not. No adverse events occurred, but participants were healthy, normotensive, and highly trained, so the protocol is not directly generalizable to inactive or higher-risk users.

Methodology

  • Healthy highly trained younger and older adults matched for BMI, SBP, sex, and VO2max percentiles.
  • 24 participants.
  • Bicycle ergometer.
  • Work intervals: 4 x 30 s all-out.
  • Recovery: 3 min active recovery.
  • Intensity: All-out.
  • About 35 min including warm-up and cool-down.
  • Acute.
  • Single session.
  • Randomized balanced crossover acute exercise study.
  • Peripheral blood pressure, Central blood pressure, Pulse wave velocity, and Heart rate were tracked.

Outcomes

Post-exercise hypotension

SIT3 produced PEH in younger and older adults; SIT1 did not.

Discussion reports SBP reductions of 13 mmHg older and 11 mmHg younger after SIT3.

Improved

Age comparison

No significant age x time interactions were detected, suggesting similar PEH effects when groups were matched.

SIT1 pSBP p=0.242, pDBP p=0.379; SIT3 pSBP p=0.773, pDBP p=0.972.

No clear change

Pulse wave velocity

PWV reduction after SIT3 was detected only in older participants.

Mixed

Safety

No adverse events were documented.

No clear change

Insights

  • Recovery duration can materially change acute blood pressure response to sprint intervals.
  • Very short 1-min recoveries may not be ideal if the goal is post-exercise BP lowering.
  • All-out cycling SIT evidence from trained adults is background context for consumer programming, not a direct prescription.

Limitations

  • Acute-only study
  • Healthy normotensive highly trained sample
  • Specific cycling protocols only
  • Menstrual cycle phase not standardized
  • Enjoyment not assessed

Safety

  • No adverse events were documented during exercise sessions.
  • Participants were healthy and highly trained; all-out SIT should not be generalized to inactive or at-risk users.