Using Inertial and Physiological Sensors to Investigate the Effects of a High-Intensity Interval Training and Plyometric Program on the Performance of Young Judokas
Question
Can inertial and physiological sensors detect performance changes after a short plyometric plus HIIT program in young judokas?
Summary
In young judokas, adding two weekly 60-minute plyometric plus HIIT sessions for 3 weeks to usual judo training improved Special Judo Fitness Test score and some throwing-speed sensor measures. The study was small, nonrandomized, athlete-specific, and did not clearly describe the added HIIT/plyometric exercise content.
Methodology
- Thirty-two young judokas born 2007-2011 who knew the Ippon-Seoi-Nage throw.
- 32 participants.
- Judo-related plyometric and HIIT training.
- Intensity: High-intensity interval training, exact intensity not reported.
- 60 min.
- 2 added sessions/week plus regular judo training.
- 3 weeks.
- Non-randomized controlled intervention
- Special Judo Fitness Test, Angular speed, and Heart rate were tracked.
Outcomes
SJFT index
The experimental group improved SJFT index; control did not.
Experimental 22.27 +/- 2.73 to 19.65 +/- 1.70, table p=0.00, d=0.61; control 20.66 to 20.27, p=0.53
X-axis speed
X-axis angular velocity increased in the experimental group.
320.87 +/- 51.15 to 356.50 +/- 40.47 deg/s; reported significant with d=0.45
Y-axis speed
Y-axis angular velocity increased in the experimental group.
259.40 +/- 41.99 to 288.02 +/- 65.12 deg/s; p=0.02, d=0.31
Round effect
Round number affected X-axis angular speed in the experimental group.
Round effect F=10.81, p<=0.001, partial eta squared=0.68
Insights
- A short add-on block may improve sport-specific conditioning in youth judokas.
- Wearable inertial sensors can detect technique-speed changes during combat-sport tests.
- The intervention is not directly reusable because the HIIT/plyometric content is not sufficiently specified.
Limitations
- Small nonrandomized sample.
- Only young judokas; growth and maturation may influence results.
- Intervention details beyond frequency and duration were unclear.
- Only 3 weeks of training.
- Sensor placement and fixation were noted as practical issues.
Safety
- Adverse events were not reported.
- Participants with musculoskeletal injury in the prior 3 months were excluded.