PMID 35996161

Research
All papers

Effects of different training intensities on blood lymphocytes, monocytes and neutrophils in young male athletes

Question

Do 8 weeks of running HIIT at 100% versus 110% maximal aerobic velocity produce different aerobic, muscle-damage, inflammatory, and hematological adaptations in young male physical education students?

Summary

In young active men, 8 weeks of supervised 30 s running intervals improved maximal aerobic velocity. Training at 110% of maximal aerobic velocity improved more than 100%, but the study was small and athlete-specific.

Methodology

  • Healthy male physical education students assigned to control, 100% MAV HIIT, or 110% MAV HIIT.
  • 29 participants.
  • running.
  • Work intervals: 30 s.
  • Recovery: 30 s active recovery at 50% MAV; 5 min passive recovery between 2 series.
  • Intensity: 110% maximal aerobic velocity for work intervals.
  • about 44-52 min including 20 min warm-up, inter-series rest, recoveries, and cool-down.
  • 3 sessions/week with at least 48 h between sessions.
  • 8 weeks; 24 sessions.
  • parallel-group randomized controlled training study
  • Maximal aerobic velocity, Muscle damage and inflammation markers, and White blood cell profile were tracked.

Outcomes

MAV

Both HIIT groups improved, with larger improvement after 110% MAV than 100% MAV.

EG100 +5.8%; EG110 +8.9%; group x time p<0.001, eta2=0.61; post-HIIT EG110 vs EG100 p=0.01, eta2=0.05

Improved

Muscle markers

Liver and muscle-damage markers generally decreased; CK decreased only in the 110% group.

ALAT and ASAT lower in both groups; EG110 lower than EG100 post-HIIT for ALAT p=0.04 and ASAT p=0.02; CK decreased only in EG110 p=0.01

Improved

Immune cells

White blood cells and neutrophils decreased in both HIIT groups; lymphocytes decreased only in the higher-intensity group.

WBC and NE decreased in both exercise groups; LY decreased only in EG110; monocytes unchanged

Mixed

Insights

  • Thirty-second running intervals can be progressed by adding repetitions across weeks while keeping work and recovery fixed.
  • The stronger 110% MAV dose improved aerobic speed more in this active male sample, but it requires individual fitness testing and supervision.
  • Blood marker changes were interpreted as adaptation and possible transient immune suppression, so recovery spacing matters.

Limitations

  • Small sample of young active men.
  • No soreness or muscle strength outcomes.
  • Protocol depends on measured maximal aerobic velocity and track pacing.

Safety

  • No testing or training injuries occurred; blood-cell changes included reduced WBC/neutrophils and lymphocytes in the higher-intensity group.