PMID 35761262

Research
All papers

Equipment-free, unsupervised high intensity interval training elicits significant improvements in the physiological resilience of older adults

Question

Can a short, equipment-free HIIT program improve cardiorespiratory, cardiometabolic, and muscle outcomes in older adults, and can an unsupervised home version work similarly to supervised lab HIIT?

Summary

In independent older adults, 4 weeks of equipment-free bodyweight HIIT improved anaerobic threshold, VO2peak, peak power, systolic blood pressure, cholesterol markers, and some muscle architecture measures versus a no-exercise control. A home unsupervised version performed similarly to a lab-supervised version, but participants were screened, instructed, and relatively healthy.

Methodology

  • Independent community-dwelling older adults.
  • 30 participants.
  • Bodyweight exercises.
  • Work intervals: 1 min.
  • Recovery: 90 s active recovery.
  • Intensity: >85% age-predicted HRmax.
  • About 12.5 min.
  • 3 sessions/week.
  • 4 weeks.
  • Randomized controlled trial with supervised HIIT, home HIIT, and no-intervention control groups.
  • Anaerobic threshold, VO2peak, Peak work rate, and Blood pressure and lipids were tracked.

Outcomes

Anaerobic threshold

Both supervised and home HIIT improved anaerobic threshold versus control, with no difference between HIIT groups.

L-HIIT +2.27 (0.57 to 3.98) p=0.007; H-HIIT +2.29 (0.59 to 4.00) p=0.006 vs control.

Improved

VO2peak and Wmax

Both HIIT formats improved VO2peak and peak work rate versus control.

VO2peak L +3.05 p=0.005; H +3.45 p=0.002; Wmax about +10.6 W p=0.005 in both.

Improved

Blood pressure and lipids

SBP, total cholesterol, and non-HDL cholesterol improved; DBP, HDL, glucose/insulin AUC and HOMA-IR did not clearly change.

SBP -6 mmHg in both HIIT groups; p=0.02 L-HIIT and p=0.05 H-HIIT.

Mixed

Adherence and safety

All participants completed the intervention with 100% adherence and no adverse safety events.

0 lost to follow-up; 100% adherence/compliance.

Improved

Insights

  • A 5 x 1-min no-equipment structure is highly translatable for screened older adults.
  • Home HIIT should still include onboarding, monitoring instructions, and eligibility checks.
  • Short programs may produce early CRF gains but need longer testing for durability.

Limitations

  • Small sample
  • Only 4 weeks
  • Healthy independent volunteers
  • Diet and habitual activity were not measured
  • Home arm still had in-person instruction and resources

Safety

  • No adverse safety events were reported.
  • Participants were screened and the home arm received protocol materials and pulse oximeter monitoring.