Inflammatory cytokines and metabolic responses to high-intensity intermittent training: effect of the exercise intensity
Question
Do 8-week HIIT programs at 100% versus 110% maximal aerobic velocity produce different metabolic, hormonal, and inflammatory adaptations in young men?
Summary
In young active men, 8 weeks of outdoor running HIIT using 30-second work and 30-second active recovery improved maximal aerobic velocity and reduced several inflammatory and metabolic responses to an intermittent exercise test. Training at 110% of maximal aerobic velocity generally produced larger improvements than 100% MAV, and no test or training injuries were reported.
Methodology
- Young active male physical education students
- 37 participants.
- Track running.
- Work intervals: 30 s at 100% or 110% MAV.
- Recovery: 30 s active recovery at 50% MAV.
- Intensity: 100% MAV or 110% MAV.
- Variable, with warm-up and cooldown.
- 3 sessions/week.
- 8 weeks.
- Randomized controlled training study with two HIIT groups and two control test groups
- MAV, Glucose and insulin, Cytokines, and Adherence and injury were tracked.
Outcomes
MAV
Both HIIT protocols increased maximal aerobic velocity, with greater increase at 110% MAV.
EG100 +5.4%, p<0.001; EG110 +8.5%, p<0.001; EG110 vs EG100 p=0.017.
Glucose
Glucose response at end HIIE decreased after HIIT, especially at 110% MAV.
EG100 Glu_end -14.7%, p=0.009; EG110 Glu_end -18.8%, p<0.001; EG110 lower than EG100 p=0.012.
IL-6
IL-6 decreased at rest, end exercise, and 15-min recovery after both protocols.
EG100 IL-6rest -34.4%, IL-6end -33.7%; EG110 IL-6rest -40.8%, IL-6end -22.8%; all p<0.001.
Safety
No training- or test-related injuries occurred and adherence was complete.
100% adherence and compliance reported.
Insights
- A progressive 30/30 running format can be advanced by adding repetitions within two sets.
- Supramaximal 110% MAV intervals may provide stronger performance and biomarker adaptations in already active young men.
Limitations
- Small groups
- Male-only
- Active young adults only
- Biomarker surrogate outcomes
- MAV testing required
Safety
- No test or training-related injuries occurred.
- All subjects had 100% adherence and compliance.