PMID 35010758

Research
All papers

Benefits on Hematological and Biochemical Parameters of a High-Intensity Interval Training Program for a Half-Marathon in Recreational Middle-Aged Women Runners

Question

Do HIIT-oriented and moderate continuous half-marathon training programs produce different hematological and biochemical responses in recreational middle-aged women runners?

Summary

Twenty recreational middle-aged women runners trained for a half-marathon with either a lower-volume HIIT-oriented program or a moderate continuous running program. Both groups completed the race; the HIIT program used less time and distance and showed some smaller post-race muscle-damage and inflammatory marker changes than the moderate program.

Methodology

  • Twenty healthy female master recreational runners
  • 20 participants.
  • Running intervals, hills, bodyweight circuit, sprints, and long runs.
  • Work intervals: Varied: 200 m, 400 m, hills, circuit stations, 50 m sprints.
  • Recovery: Varied.
  • Intensity: High-intensity elements; exact target not reported.
  • Total 33 h 26 min across 12 weeks.
  • 3 sessions/week.
  • 12 weeks.
  • Randomized training comparison from a larger trial
  • Inflammation, Muscle damage, Lipids, and Electrolytes were tracked.

Outcomes

Training load

HIIT used less time and distance than MICT.

33 h 26 min vs 40 h 30 min; 301 km vs 383 km.

Improved

CK

Post-race CK rose in both groups but less in HIIT.

HIIT +63% vs MICT +153%; p=0.043.

Improved

CRP

Post-race CRP rose in both groups but less in HIIT.

Between-group post-race difference p=0.039.

Improved

Safety markers

No hyponatremia or liver-injury signal was reported, but post-race oxidative and inflammatory stress increased.

Mixed

Insights

  • Lower-volume interval-oriented training may be feasible for experienced half-marathon runners.
  • Race preparation and race completion still produce measurable recovery stress.
  • Consumer programming should include recovery, hydration, and runner-readiness constraints.

Limitations

  • Small sample.
  • Women-only trained runner population.
  • Nutritional data were limited.
  • Premenopausal status variability may confound biochemical markers.
  • Adverse-event and adherence reporting were limited.

Safety

  • Adverse events and dropouts were not explicitly reported.
  • Participants were screened as healthy, nonsmoking, premenopausal, medication-free, and injury-free recreational runners.
  • All participants appear in final sampling and race analyses; the race increased muscle-damage, inflammatory, and oxidative-stress markers.
  • The authors reported no exercise-associated hyponatremia and no liver-injury marker pattern.