Effect of High-Intensity Interval Training on Quality of Life, Sleep Quality, Exercise Motivation and Enjoyment in Sedentary People with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
Question
Does supervised HIIT improve quality of life, sleep quality, exercise motivation, and enjoyment in sedentary adults with type 1 diabetes?
Summary
In sedentary adults with type 1 diabetes, 6 weeks of supervised cycling HIIT improved several self-reported quality-of-life domains, sleep quality, exercise enjoyment, and more self-determined motivation compared with a lifestyle-maintenance control group. Mild hypoglycemia occurred after 1.5% of training sessions and resolved with carbohydrate intake and rest. The study was small and short.
Methodology
- Nineteen sedentary adults with type 1 diabetes: HIIT n=11 and control n=8. Participants were 18-45 years old, had type 1 diabetes for more than 4 years, HbA1c below 10%, no structured exercise in the prior 6 months, and no known comorbidities.
- 19 participants.
- Cycle ergometer HIIT.
- Work intervals: 30 sec.
- Recovery: 1 min.
- Intensity: High-intensity bouts at 85% peak power output; active recovery at 40% peak power output.
- About 28-40 min depending on progression.
- 3.
- 6 weeks.
- Randomized controlled parallel trial
- Health-related quality of life by SF-36, Sleep quality by PSQI, Exercise motivation by BREQ-2, and Exercise enjoyment by PACES were tracked.
Outcomes
SF-36 quality-of-life domains
HIIT improved several SF-36 domains including physical functioning, physical role limitations, pain, general health, energy/fatigue, and social functioning; control did not change.
Sleep quality
Sleep quality improved in the HIIT group, with PSQI indicating a move toward better sleep quality.
Exercise motivation
HIIT improved intrinsic and identified motivation and reduced external regulation and amotivation; control did not show comparable changes.
Exercise enjoyment increased after HIIT.
Exercise enjoyment increased after HIIT.
Mild hypoglycemia events
Three mild hypoglycemia cases occurred in 198 training sessions (1.5%), immediately after exercise, and resolved with rest and carbohydrate ingestion.
Insights
- Supervised HIIT can be enjoyable and motivating in a clinical group when safety rules are explicit.
- Consumer products should not generalize this to unsupervised T1DM HIIT without glucose monitoring and medical guidance.
- Short progressive interval prescriptions may support perceived quality-of-life and motivation outcomes.
Limitations
- Small sample and short intervention.
- No type 1 diabetes-specific quality-of-life questionnaire.
- No objective sleep measurement.
- Diet was not measured.
- No medical specialists were part of the research team, although university medical services were aware.
Safety
- Three mild hypoglycemia cases (mean 67.9 +/- 2.6 mg/dL) occurred immediately after exercise.
- No adverse cardiac, respiratory, or musculoskeletal injuries were reported.
- No hyperglycemia, nocturnal hypoglycemia, or ketoacidosis was reported.