PMID 33923545

Research
All papers

Acute Effects of Work Rest Interval Duration of 3 HIIT Protocols on Cycling Power in Trained Young Adults

Question

How do 30-, 60-, and 90-second work-rest intervals affect acute cycling power, heart rate, lactate, and jump performance when total work is matched?

Summary

Twenty-two young trained men completed three acute all-out cycling HIIT protocols with 30-, 60-, or 90-second work intervals. Shorter intervals allowed higher power output while lactate and jump performance responses were not meaningfully different; all participants completed sessions without incidents.

Methodology

  • Twenty-two active young men experienced with HIIT
  • 22 participants.
  • Cycle ergometer.
  • Work intervals: 30 seconds.
  • Recovery: 30 seconds passive rest.
  • Intensity: All-out self-selected workload.
  • 10-minute interval block after warm-up.
  • One acute session.
  • Crossover over three weeks.
  • Counterbalanced crossover acute exercise study
  • Cycling power, Heart rate, Blood lactate, and Countermovement jump were tracked.

Outcomes

Power

30-second intervals produced higher maximal and mean cycling power than longer intervals.

Pmax and Pmean p<0.001.

Improved

HR

Mean HR was higher in the 30-second protocol than the 90-second protocol.

HRmean p<0.001.

Mixed

Lactate

Blood lactate did not differ significantly across interval durations.

p about 0.337-0.373.

No clear change

CMJ

Jump height and jump power did not differ significantly by protocol.

CMJ height p=0.682; CMJ power p=0.832.

No clear change

Insights

  • For power-focused workouts, shorter all-out intervals may preserve output better than longer all-out intervals.
  • A 1:1 work-rest density can be implemented with different interval lengths, but physiological and performance outputs differ.
  • All-out interval prescriptions should be reserved for experienced users.

Limitations

  • Small all-male sample.
  • Participants were trained young adults, limiting beginner applicability.
  • Acute-only protocol with no adaptation outcomes.
  • No non-exercise control group.

Safety

  • All 22 participants completed the three HIIT sessions without incidents.
  • Participants were active, HIIT-experienced young men screened for medications and compliance with pre-session guidelines.
  • Sessions were supervised by professional sport scientists with heart-rate and lactate monitoring.