PMID 29736007

Research
All papers

Effects of high-intensity interval training on fatigue and quality of life in testicular cancer survivors

Question

Does 12 weeks of supervised high-intensity interval training improve patient-reported outcomes in testicular cancer survivors compared with usual care, and are effects mediated by cardiorespiratory fitness or moderated by baseline clinical characteristics?

Summary

In a phase II randomized controlled trial, 63 testicular cancer survivors were assigned to 12 weeks of supervised treadmill high-intensity interval training or usual care. The HIIT group improved cancer-related fatigue, self-esteem, and several health-related quality-of-life domains after training, with fatigue and vitality benefits persisting at 3-month follow-up. Training adherence and target-intensity achievement were very high, and no exercise-related serious adverse events were reported.

Methodology

  • Post-treatment male testicular cancer survivors with confirmed stage I-IV history, excluding regular vigorous exercisers and those with uncontrolled cardiovascular or psychiatric conditions.
  • 63 participants.
  • Uphill treadmill walking or running.
  • Work intervals: 4 min.
  • Recovery: 3 min active recovery.
  • Intensity: 75%-95% VO2peak for work intervals; recovery 5%-10% below ventilatory threshold.
  • 35 min.
  • 3 sessions/week.
  • 12 weeks.
  • Prospective two-arm phase II randomized controlled trial with post-intervention and 3-month follow-up assessments.
  • Cancer-related fatigue, Health-related quality of life, Psychosocial functioning, and Cardiorespiratory fitness were tracked.

Outcomes

Cancer-related fatigue

HIIT significantly improved post-intervention fatigue compared with usual care, and the effect persisted at 3-month follow-up.

Post-intervention adjusted between-group mean difference 4.4 points, 95% CI 1.5 to 7.3, p=0.003; follow-up p=0.031.

Improved

Self-esteem

HIIT significantly improved self-esteem at post-intervention compared with usual care.

p=0.029

Improved

SF-36 HRQoL domains

HIIT improved mental component score, vitality, social functioning, general health, and role-physical at post-intervention; vitality persisted at follow-up.

MCS p=0.034, vitality p=0.001, social functioning p=0.011, general health p=0.016, role-physical p=0.048; 3-month vitality p=0.015.

Improved

Depression, anxiety, stress, sleep quality, and selected SF-36 domains

No significant effects were observed for depression, anxiety, stress, sleep quality, physical functioning, bodily pain, role-emotional, or physical component score.

Depression p=0.81, anxiety p=0.19, stress p=0.22, sleep quality p=0.15, physical functioning p=0.77, bodily pain p=0.41, role-emotional p=0.36, PCS p=0.34.

No clear change

Cardiorespiratory fitness

HIIT improved VO2peak relative to usual care, and VO2peak changes mediated selected PRO improvements.

VO2peak improved by 3.7 ml O2/kg/min, p<0.001; mediation evidence reported for MCS, mental health, CRF, and vitality at p<0.05 or p<0.10 depending on outcome/timepoint.

Improved

Insights

  • A supervised 4 x 4-minute HIIT protocol can be feasible and highly adherent in selected testicular cancer survivors.
  • Fatigue and vitality are stronger practical targets from this study than depression, anxiety, stress, or sleep quality.
  • Clinical HIIT programming should include screening, supervision, and progression rather than direct unsupervised transfer.

Limitations

  • No outcome assessor blinding.
  • Low initial response rate and possible self-selection bias.
  • Limited 3-month follow-up.
  • Variable time since diagnosis.
  • Small sample size for PRO analyses.
  • Loss to follow-up at 3 months.
  • Baseline clinical fatigue imbalance.
  • No attention-control comparison group.
  • Exploratory mediation and moderation analyses.

Safety

  • No exercise-related serious adverse events were reported or observed.
  • Participants achieved 98% of target work-phase heart rates and attended 99% of sessions under one-on-one supervision.