PMID 27212809

Research
All papers

Acute-Phase Inflammatory Response to Single-Bout HIIT and Endurance Training: A Comparative Study

Question

Do acute inflammatory and metabolic blood-marker responses differ after a single low-volume HIIT cycling session compared with a traditional endurance cycling session in healthy untrained adults?

Summary

In seven healthy untrained young adults who completed both exercise sessions, a single sprint-style HIIT cycling session produced broadly similar short-term inflammatory blood-marker responses to a 45-minute endurance cycling session. The endurance session lowered the IL-6/IL-10 ratio at 30 minutes and MCP-1 two days later, while individual cytokines and CRP did not significantly change after either session.

Methodology

  • Healthy untrained young adults without chronic disease, medication or supplement use, smoking, or regular structured training
  • 7 participants.
  • cycle.
  • Work intervals: 30 seconds.
  • Recovery: 240 seconds.
  • Intensity: All-out supramaximal work bouts.
  • About 25 minutes.
  • Single session.
  • Two single-session exercise visits separated by at least 7 days, with blood sampling before, 30 minutes after, and 2 days after each session.
  • Randomized-order repeated-measures acute exercise study
  • Inflammatory markers, and Metabolic markers were tracked.

Outcomes

CRP

CRP did not significantly change after either HIIT or endurance cycling.

Favours: no_difference

No clear change

Cytokines

IL-1beta, IL-6, IL-10, and IGF-1 did not significantly change from baseline after either protocol.

Favours: no_difference

No clear change

IL-6/IL-10

Endurance cycling reduced the IL-6/IL-10 ratio 30 minutes post-exercise.

Effect: -20%; P value/detail: 0.047; Favours: comparator

Improved

MCP-1

Endurance cycling reduced MCP-1 two days after exercise.

Effect: -17.9%; P value/detail: 0.03; Favours: comparator

Improved

Insights

  • A very low-volume cycling HIIT session can be implemented with six 30-second all-out bouts and long recoveries, but this protocol may not be tolerable for every untrained participant.
  • Acute biomarker equivalence should not be presented as evidence that HIIT improves long-term inflammation.

Limitations

  • Very small analytic sample.
  • Acute single-session design.
  • Healthy young adults only.
  • Biomarker outcomes rather than fitness, adherence, or clinical outcomes.
  • One participant could not complete the HIIT protocol.

Safety

  • No adverse events were reported in the article.
  • One recruited participant was excluded because they could not complete the HIIT session.