Effects of High Intensity Interval versus Moderate Continuous Training on Markers of Ventilatory and Cardiac Efficiency in Coronary Heart Disease Patients
Question
Do 16 weeks of HIIT improve peak VO2, VE/VCO2 slope, oxygen uptake efficiency slope, and oxygen pulse more than moderate continuous training or no exercise in coronary heart disease patients?
Summary
This randomized controlled trial compared 16 weeks of supervised treadmill HIIT, moderate continuous training, and no exercise in stable coronary heart disease patients. HIIT used 30 minutes of alternating 2-minute bouts at 90% and 60% peak heart rate, with 5-minute warm-up and cool-down, 3 times per week. All subjects completed the program and no untoward events occurred. HIIT improved peak VO2, peak oxygen pulse, and oxygen pulse slope, while moderate training did not improve peak VO2 and ventilatory efficiency markers were not significantly changed by either exercise regimen.
Methodology
- Stable coronary heart disease patients referred to cardiac rehabilitation with optimized treatment and ejection fraction greater than 50%.
- 71 participants.
- Treadmill aerobic training.
- Work intervals: 2 minutes at 90% peak HR.
- Recovery: 2 minutes at 60% peak HR.
- Intensity: 90% peak HR high bouts and 60% peak HR low bouts.
- 40 minutes including 5 minute warm-up, 30 minute interval block, and 5 minute cool-down.
- 3 times/week.
- 16 weeks.
- Randomized controlled trial with HIIT, moderate continuous training, and nonexercise control groups.
- Peak VO2, VE/VCO2 slope, Oxygen uptake efficiency slope, and Oxygen pulse were tracked.
Outcomes
Peak VO2
HIIT increased peak VO2 from 20.6 +/- 5 to 24.4 +/- 5 mL/kg/min; MIT remained 21.8 +/- 6 to 21.9 +/- 6; CG decreased 21.9 +/- 6 to 18.6 +/- 6.
Interaction P = 0.04; HIIT within-group P < 0.05; CG within-group decrease P < 0.05 and CG versus HIIT P < 0.05.
Peak oxygen pulse
HIIT increased peak oxygen pulse from 12.4 +/- 4 to 14.2 +/- 4 mL/beat; MIT was stable; CG decreased from 13.7 +/- 4 to 11.7 +/- 4.
Interaction P = 0.05; HIIT within-group P < 0.05; CG within-group decrease P < 0.05 and CG versus HIIT P < 0.05.
O2 pulse slope
O2 pulse slope increased in HIIT by about 22%, was stable in MIT at about 2%, and decreased in CG by about 20%.
HIIT P < 0.05; MIT P > 0.05; CG P < 0.05; CG lower versus HIIT P = 0.03; differences versus CG after 70% of CPX duration P < 0.05.
VE/VCO2 slope and OUES
No differences among groups were found for VE/VCO2 slope or OUES before versus after training.
VE/VCO2 slope interaction P = 0.48; OUES interaction P = 0.16.
Safety
All subjects completed the program and no untoward events occurred during exercise testing or training procedures.
Insights
- For stable CHD patients in supervised rehabilitation, 2-minute 90%/60% peak-HR treadmill intervals improved peak VO2 where 30-minute moderate continuous training did not.
- The protocol included explicit warm-up and cooldown and medical monitoring, which are core safety features for clinical HIIT.
- Ventilatory efficiency markers did not improve, so claims should distinguish fitness/oxygen pulse outcomes from VE/VCO2 or OUES.
Limitations
- Participants had mild or moderate CHD with preserved ejection fraction, limiting generalization to more severe cardiac disease.
- Mechanisms were not directly tested with invasive measures of lung perfusion, arterial blood gases, or ventricular function.
- Training was supervised and medically monitored, limiting translation to unsupervised app exercise.
- Actual achieved training intensity and exact interval count/order were not reported.
- HIIT group was younger on average than MIT and CG, although baseline group differences were not statistically significant.
Safety
- All subjects completed the program.
- No untoward events occurred during exercise testing or training procedures.
- No patient was limited by angina.
- No patients showed ECG evidence of ischemia during baseline CPX.
- Exercise testing used termination criteria including moderately severe angina, ST depression greater than 2.0 mm, sustained systolic blood pressure drop, or clinically relevant rhythm disturbance.
- A cardiologist checked ECG responses once weekly at the beginning and end of training sessions.