PMID 20683609

Research
All papers

High-intensity interval training improves VO(2peak), maximal lactate accumulation, time trial and competition performance in 9-11-year-old swimmers

Question

How does 5 weeks of high-intensity swim interval training compare with high-volume swim training for performance and physiological outcomes in young competitive swimmers?

Summary

In competitive 9- to 11-year-old swimmers, 5 weeks of lower-volume high-intensity swim interval training improved competition points, 2,000 m time, VO2peak, and maximal lactate accumulation while using about half the swim volume of high-volume training. Both interventions improved VO2peak, and no overreaching symptoms were reported.

Methodology

  • Healthy competitive young swimmers accustomed to more than four training units per week.
  • 26 participants.
  • Swimming intervals in a 50 m pool.
  • Work intervals: Intervals ranging from 50 to 800 m in the main set.
  • Recovery: Not clearly reported in the the paper.
  • Intensity: 92% of personal best time for each distance.
  • Warm-up about 400 m, 10-15 × 20 m technical drills, 30-minute main set, and cool-down.
  • 5 sessions per week.
  • 5 weeks.
  • Randomized-order crossover intervention.
  • Competition performance, Swim time trials, VO2peak and ventilatory threshold, and Maximal lactate accumulation were tracked.

Outcomes

Competition performance

LEN competition performance improved after HIIT but not after HVT.

HIIT +14.8%, p < 0.01, d = 0.48; HVT +5.8%, p = 0.28, d = 0.17.

Improved

2,000 m time

2,000 m swimming time improved after HIIT only.

HIIT -2.8%, p = 0.04, d = 0.21; HVT -1.8%, p = 0.33, d = 0.13.

Improved

VO2peak

VO2peak improved after both HIIT and high-volume training.

HIIT +10.2%, p < 0.01, d = 0.57; HVT +8.5%, p < 0.01, d = 0.46.

Improved

Lacmax

Maximal lactate accumulation increased after HIIT and decreased after high-volume training.

HIIT +20.1%, p < 0.01, d = 0.43; HVT -30.1%, p < 0.01, d = 0.51.

Mixed

100 m time

100 m sprint time did not significantly change after either training block.

HIIT p = 0.17; HVT p = 0.22 in total sample.

No clear change

Insights

  • For trained youth swimmers, a lower-volume higher-intensity block can improve performance-relevant outcomes with less pool time than high-volume training.
  • The protocol is sport-specific swimming coaching evidence, not a general youth fitness prescription.
  • Monitoring for overreaching is important when increasing intensity in children.

Limitations

  • Young competitive swimmers only.
  • VO2peak was measured on a cycle ergometer rather than swim-specific oxygen uptake.
  • Detailed interval-rest structure was not fully extractable from text.
  • Short intervention with no long-term follow-up.
  • Potential carryover despite breaks in a crossover design.

Safety

  • Children and/or parents were asked to report adverse physical or mental reactions immediately.
  • A computer-based psychological questionnaire was completed before each intervention session.
  • No swimmers or parents reported overreaching/burnout symptoms after either training period.
  • Protocol adherence was controlled with coaches' daily exercise log books.