# Dose-Response Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training on Body Fat, Blood Pressure, and Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Adolescents: A School-Based Randomized Controlled Trial with Responder Analysis

PMID: 41283546
Journal: Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology
Published: 2025-11-13
Authors: Domaradzki J, Murawska-Ciałowicz E, Popowczak M, Kochan-Jacheć K, Szkudlarek P, Koźlenia D

## Question

Do 6, 8, and 10 minute school-based HIIT sessions produce dose-response changes in body fat percentage, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and VO2max among adolescents, including adolescents previously classified as non-responders?

## Summary

This school-based follow-up trial tested whether adolescents who had previously shown little or no response to HIIT could improve after a modified six-week Tabata-style program using 6, 8, or 10 minute HIIT sessions during physical education classes. Body fat percentage and blood pressure did not show clear group-level dose differences, but VO2max improved most consistently with the 10 minute sessions. Bayesian responder analyses suggested substantial individual variability and showed that many prior non-responders became responders after the modified intervention, especially for VO2max and systolic blood pressure.

## Population

- Adolescents in the PEER-HEART school project, including prior HIIT non-responders and prior responders used as a control reference.
- Sample size: 137
- Age: Group means approximately 16.50 to 16.99 years.
- Sex: 66 male and 71 female across E6m, E8m, E10m, CON, and CON-Rs.
- Fitness level: School adolescents; VO2max estimated from the Multistage Fitness Test with baseline means varying by sex and group.
- Health status: Apparently healthy adolescent school population.

## Methodology

- School-based randomized follow-up intervention with three HIIT duration arms, one non-intervention control group, and a stable responder control reference group; Bayesian responder classification and regression analyses were used.
- 6 weeks, with assessments before and immediately after the intervention; the follow-up intervention occurred six months after an initial 8 week PE-based intervention.
- Physical education classes in a school environment.
- Randomized and controlled study design.

## Protocol

- 6, 8, or 10 minute Tabata-style school HIIT.
- Modality: Bodyweight/calisthenic and plyometric movement pairs.
- Work intervals: 20 seconds maximal effort.
- Recovery: 10 seconds passive rest.
- Sets or repetitions: Repeated 20:10 cycles for 6, 8, or 10 minutes; AMRAP repetitions during each work bout.
- Intensity: Maximal effort; heart rate monitored with Polar devices.
- Session duration: 10 minute warm-up plus 6, 8, or 10 minute HIIT main set.
- Frequency: 2 sessions per week.
- Program length: 6 weeks.
- Progression: Session duration differed by group; no within-group progression reported for the follow-up intervention.
- Non-intervention and stable responder controls.
- Modality: Regular physical education exposure only for CON; CON-Rs served as a stable prior-responder reference.
- Program length: 6 weeks.

## Outcomes

### VO2max
Status: improved
VO2max improved over time, with the strongest and most consistent effects reported for the 10 minute HIIT and CON-Rs groups.

Time F(1,127)=31.239, p<0.001; duration x time F(4,127)=25.900, p<0.001; duration effect approached significance F(4,127)=2.401, p=0.053.

### Body fat percentage
Status: mixed
BF% showed a main effect of time but no significant duration effect or duration-by-time interaction; post hoc pre-post comparisons in groups were not significant after correction.

Time F(1,127)=11.730, p<0.001; duration F(4,127)=1.161, p=0.331; duration x time F(4,127)=0.645, p=0.632.

### Blood pressure
Status: no clear change
Group-level analyses did not show significant HIIT duration effects for SBP or DBP over time.

SBP time p=0.587 and duration x time p=0.907; DBP time p=0.900 and duration p=0.815.

### Prior non-responder improvement
Status: improved
Many prior non-responders improved after the modified intervention; final Bayesian responder proportions ranged from 53.2% for VO2max to 68.4% for DBP.

McNemar significant for SBP p<0.001 and VO2max p<0.001; GEE prior non-responsive outcome OR=2.46, 95% CI 1.37-4.43, p=0.003.

## Practical Insights

- A 20:10 Tabata-style bodyweight format can fit into short school PE windows and still produce measurable aerobic changes.
- Extending the main set toward 10 minutes may be useful when the target is VO2max adaptation, but evidence for fat or blood-pressure dose-response was weak.
- Responder monitoring matters because some adolescents improve even when group-level effects are modest.

## Limitations

- No long-term follow-up.
- Maturation stage and BMI were not stratified.
- Minor maturation changes across the six-month interval may have contributed to variability.
- Some heart-rate data were missing and imputed.
- Results are from supervised school PE and may not generalize to unsupervised settings.

## Safety And Adherence

- The public extraction did not identify a specific safety or adherence note.

## Original Sources

- [PubMed](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41283546/) (pubmed)
- [DOI](https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk10040439) (doi)
- [PMC full text](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12641850/) (full text)

## Agent Guidance

Preserve the paper-level scope of this note. Do not generalize beyond the population, protocol, measured outcomes, and limitations above.