# A comparison of the effects of remote coaching HIIT training and combined exercise training on the physical and mental health of university students

PMID: 37251041
Journal: Frontiers in psychology
Published: 2023-05-12
Authors: Wang Y, Jia N, Zhou Y, Fu L, Fan L, Li B

## Question

To compare the effects of remote coached high-intensity interval training and remote coached combined aerobic plus resistance exercise on physical fitness, body composition, sleep, and mental health in university students.

## Summary

This randomized trial compared 8 weeks of remotely coached HIIT with remotely coached combined aerobic and resistance training in university students. Fifty-eight of 60 randomized students were analyzed. Both groups trained for 40 minutes, three times per week, with mobile or computer video supervision. HIIT produced a large within-group increase in estimated maximum oxygen uptake and improved several SCL-90 mental-health scores, while both groups improved body weight, BMI, body fat percentage, waist-to-hip ratio, and flexibility. Sleep findings were mixed, and the authors noted that evening HIIT duration and dose may have worsened sleep quality.

## Population

- Healthy normal-BMI non-athletic-major university students recruited from Shandong Normal University.
- Sample size: 58
- Age: HIIT 19.91 +/- 1.57 years; AR 19.59 +/- 1.53 years.
- Sex: Table reports HIIT 7/15 male/female and AR 8/17 male/female, but these counts do not sum to n=29 per group.
- Fitness level: Non-athletic majors; baseline maximum oxygen uptake 36.65 +/- 8.86 in HIIT and 40.44 +/- 4.72 in AR.
- Health status: Healthy, BMI 18.5-23.9, without major cardiovascular/metabolic/endocrine disease, smoking, heavy drinking, pregnancy/planned pregnancy, or diagnosed depressive/anxiety disorders.

## Methodology

- Randomized parallel controlled exercise intervention comparing two active remote-coached exercise programmes.
- 8 weeks.
- Remote video intervention using mobile phone or computer, coordinated through a WeChat group, with outcomes tested by professionals from Shandong Normal University.
- Randomized and controlled study design.

## Protocol

- Remote coached HIIT.
- Modality: Remote coached high-intensity interval training movements; exact exercise list not specified.
- Sets or repetitions: Exact sets and repetitions not specified.
- Intensity: High intensity monitored with exercise bracelet; exact target not specified.
- Session duration: 40 minutes: 5 minutes preparation, 30 minutes HIIT, 5 minutes relaxation.
- Frequency: 3 sessions per week.
- Program length: 8 weeks.
- Progression: Every fortnight, increased movement difficulty and reduced rest time between movements.
- Remote coached combined aerobic and resistance training.
- Modality: Aerobic exercise plus elastic-band resistance exercise.
- Intensity: Not specified; same remote instruction and supervision measures as HIIT.
- Session duration: 40 minutes: 5 minutes preparation, 15 minutes aerobic exercise, 15 minutes elastic-band resistance exercise, 5 minutes relaxation.
- Frequency: 3 sessions per week.
- Program length: 8 weeks.
- Progression: Other exercise instruction and supervision measures were the same as in the HIIT group; exact progression not separately specified.

## Outcomes

### Maximum oxygen uptake
Status: improved
HIIT substantially improved maximum oxygen uptake, whereas AR did not; between-group analysis favored HIIT.

HIIT 36.65 +/- 8.86 to 47.21 +/- 4.28, p=0.000, d=1.52; AR 40.44 +/- 4.72 to 39.32 +/- 6.57, p=0.413, d=0.20; group p=0.000.

### SCL-90
Status: improved
HIIT improved total score and several subscales within group; AR improved psychoticism only within group; between-group differences were not significant for SCL-90 outcomes.

HIIT total score 113.32 +/- 16.37 to 104.41 +/- 13.96, p=0.000, d=0.59; group p=0.861.

### PSQI sleep quality
Status: mixed
Total PSQI did not significantly improve in either group; sleep efficiency worsened in HIIT and differed between groups, and the authors interpreted HIIT as potentially having a negative impact on sleep quality.

HIIT total PSQI 3.64 +/- 1.79 to 4.36 +/- 2.74, p=0.222; sleep efficiency 0.05 +/- 0.21 to 0.23 +/- 0.43, p=0.042, group p=0.007.

### Body composition
Status: improved
Both HIIT and AR improved body weight, BMI, body fat percentage, and waist-to-hip ratio within group, with no significant between-group differences.

Body weight p=0.000 in HIIT and p=0.001 in AR; BMI p=0.000 in both; body fat percentage p=0.002 in HIIT and p=0.000 in AR; waist-to-hip ratio p=0.001 in HIIT and p=0.000 in AR; group p values not significant.

### Strength and flexibility
Status: mixed
HIIT improved grip strength and flexibility; AR improved back muscle strength and flexibility; between-group differences were not significant.

HIIT grip p=0.031 and flexibility p=0.011; AR back muscle strength p=0.000 and flexibility p=0.028.

## Practical Insights

- Remote coached HIIT can improve aerobic fitness in healthy university students over 8 weeks.
- Both remote HIIT and combined aerobic/resistance exercise may improve body composition in this population.
- Long or evening HIIT sessions may be a poor fit when sleep quality is a priority.
- Remote programming can combine pre-shared videos, live supervision, wearable intensity monitoring, attendance tracking, and scheduled progression.

## Limitations

- Small single-university sample.
- No inactive or usual-care control group.
- Exact HIIT exercises, work intervals, recovery intervals, and achieved intensity were not reported.
- Sex counts in Table 1 do not sum to analyzed group sizes.
- No long-term follow-up.
- Mental health and sleep outcomes relied on questionnaires.

## Safety And Adherence

- No adverse events or injuries were reported in the article.
- The sample excluded major cardiometabolic/endocrine disease, smokers, heavy drinkers, pregnancy/planned pregnancy, and diagnosed psychological disorders.
- The authors suggested that the HIIT dose and evening timing may have negatively affected sleep.

## Original Sources

- [PubMed](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37251041/) (pubmed)
- [DOI](https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1182332) (doi)
- [PMC full text](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10213529/) (full text)

## Agent Guidance

Preserve the paper-level scope of this note. Do not generalize beyond the population, protocol, measured outcomes, and limitations above.