# Effect of High-Intensity Interval Training on Glycemic Control in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes and Overweight or Obesity: A Randomized Controlled Trial With Partial Crossover

PMID: 32647051
Journal: Diabetes Care
Published: 2020-09
Authors: Lee AS, Johnson NA, McGill MJ, Overland J, Luo C, Baker CJ, Martinez-Huenchullan S, Wong J, Flack JR, Twigg SM

## Question

Can 12 weeks of high-intensity interval training reduce HbA1c and improve cardiometabolic risk factors in inactive adults with type 1 diabetes and overweight or obesity?

## Summary

Thirty inactive adults with type 1 diabetes and overweight or obesity were randomized to 12 weeks of HIIT or usual care, with the control group later crossing over to HIIT. The primary 12-week comparison did not show a statistically significant HbA1c reduction versus control, although participants who completed at least half of prescribed sessions had a greater HbA1c reduction. The program used 33 min sessions, three times weekly, with 4 x 4 min intervals at 85-95% peak heart rate. One severe hypoglycemia event occurred immediately after a supervised HIIT session in the first week, while no adverse cardiac, respiratory, musculoskeletal, or ketoacidosis events were reported.

## Population

- Inactive adults with type 1 diabetes, BMI >=25 kg/m2, HbA1c 7.5-10.5%, and overweight or obesity.
- Sample size: 30
- Age: 44 +/- 10 years overall in abstract; randomized groups 40.5 +/- 10.0 and 46.1 +/- 10.5 years.
- Sex: 16 male and 11 female among 27 participants with 12-week outcome data; randomized baseline table shows HIIT 6 male/6 female and control 10 male/5 female.
- Fitness level: Inactive; less than 150 min/week moderate exercise for previous 6 months.
- Health status: Type 1 diabetes for >1 year with overweight or obesity and HbA1c above target.

## Methodology

- Randomized controlled trial with partial crossover of the control group to HIIT for a subsequent 12 weeks.
- 12-week randomized comparison, with 24-week follow-up/partial crossover structure.
- Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, with at least one supervised gym session per week and additional home or own-gym sessions.
- Randomized and controlled study design.

## Protocol

- HIIT.
- Modality: Cycle ergometer or treadmill in facility; walking or jogging at home.
- Work intervals: 4 min at 85-95% HRpeak.
- Recovery: 3 min at 50-70% HRpeak.
- Sets or repetitions: 4 high-intensity bouts with 3 recovery bouts.
- Intensity: Heart-rate-guided: 85-95% HRpeak for high intervals.
- Session duration: 33 min.
- Frequency: 3 sessions per week.
- Program length: 12 weeks for primary intervention; some participants continued for 24 weeks.
- Progression: No explicit progression in interval dose; continued protocol with transition to unsupervised sessions in study period 2 for original intervention group.
- Usual care control.
- Modality: Usual daily activities.
- Program length: 12 weeks before partial crossover.
- Progression: No structured exercise recommendation or restriction.

## Outcomes

### HbA1c primary comparison
Status: no clear change
HbA1c decreased within the HIIT group, but the between-group change versus control did not reach statistical significance.

HIIT -0.53 +/- 0.61% versus control -0.14 +/- 0.48%, p = 0.08; within HIIT baseline 8.63 +/- 0.66% to 8.10 +/- 1.04%, p = 0.01.

### HbA1c among adherent participants
Status: improved
Participants who completed at least 50% of prescribed HIIT had a significantly greater HbA1c reduction than control.

HIIT -0.64 +/- 0.64% (n = 9) versus control -0.14 +/- 0.48% (n = 15), p = 0.04.

### Longitudinal HbA1c after completing HIIT
Status: improved
Across 24 participants who completed a 12-week HIIT intervention, HbA1c decreased significantly.

-0.40 +/- 0.62%, p = 0.006.

### Insulin dose and CGM hypoglycemia
Status: no clear change
There were no between-group differences in insulin dose or hypoglycemia on CGM.

### Blood pressure, lipids, body weight, and body composition
Status: no clear change
No between-group differences were found for blood pressure, blood lipids, body weight, or body composition.

### Exercise capacity and leg strength
Status: improved
The intervention group improved maximal treadmill exercise test time and leg press strength, without a significant VO2peak change.

Bruce protocol time p = 0.001 within HIIT; leg press p < 0.001 within HIIT.

### Safety
Status: mixed
One severe hypoglycemia event occurred immediately after supervised HIIT, with no adverse cardiac, respiratory, musculoskeletal, or ketoacidosis events reported.

## Practical Insights

- The 4 x 4 min aerobic HIIT structure is reproducible but depends on heart-rate monitoring and adherence.
- For type 1 diabetes, HIIT programming needs explicit hypoglycemia planning and individualized insulin/carbohydrate support.
- Modest adherence may be enough for a glycemic signal, but average adherence was only about two sessions per week despite support.
- HIIT should not be framed as clearly improving HbA1c in this population based on the primary randomized comparison alone.

## Limitations

- Primary HbA1c comparison did not reach statistical significance.
- Small sample and modified intention-to-treat based on participants with 12-week outcome data.
- Suboptimal exercise adherence.
- Control-group physical activity was not restricted or explicitly measured.
- No active exercise comparator.
- Diabetes consultation intensity differed between intervention and control conditions.
- Dietary changes were not quantified.
- VO2peak measurement reliability may have been affected by mask leakage and gas analyzer service repair.
- Clinical population limits generalization to general fitness users.

## Safety And Adherence

- One severe hypoglycemia event occurred immediately after a supervised HIIT session in the first week.
- The participant could not drink juice because of nausea and was treated with parenteral glucose plus short emergency department observation.
- There was no loss of consciousness.
- Contributing factors included mild hypoglycemia earlier that day and difficulty managing glucose when initiating a new exercise program.
- No adverse cardiac events, respiratory events, musculoskeletal injuries related to HIIT, or diabetic ketoacidosis were reported.

## Original Sources

- [PubMed](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32647051/) (pubmed)
- [DOI](https://doi.org/10.2337/dc20-0342) (doi)
- [PMC full text](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7440893/) (full text)

## Agent Guidance

Preserve the paper-level scope of this note. Do not generalize beyond the population, protocol, measured outcomes, and limitations above.