# Similar Health Benefits of Endurance and High-Intensity Interval Training in Obese Children

PMID: 22880097
Journal: PLOS ONE
Published: 2012-08-06
Authors: Corte de Araujo AC, Roschel H, Picanço AR, do Prado DM, Villares SM, de Sá Pinto AL, Gualano B

## Question

Do endurance training and high-intensity interval training produce different health-related effects in physically inactive obese children aged 8-12 years?

## Summary

This randomized 12 week trial compared treadmill endurance training with high-intensity interval training in obese children aged 8-12 years. Both groups improved aerobic fitness, exercise test performance, insulin, HOMA-IR, and BMI. The HIT group trained for much less time and also showed within-group reductions in body weight and systolic blood pressure. No adverse events were detected by weekly medical examination.

## Population

- Physically inactive obese outpatient children aged 8-12 years recruited from a university hospital obesity clinic in Sao Paulo, Brazil.
- Sample size: 30
- Age: ET 10.4 (0.9) years; HIT 10.7 (0.7) years.
- Sex: ET 11 female and 4 male; HIT 10 female and 5 male.
- Fitness level: Physically inactive except school physical education twice weekly; baseline maximal treadmill testing used for training prescription.
- Health status: Obese, BMI at or above 95th percentile; no metabolic, hormonal, orthopedic, or cardiovascular disease at commencement.

## Methodology

- Randomized two-arm exercise training trial comparing continuous endurance training with treadmill high-intensity interval training.
- 12 weeks.
- Exercise training on treadmills in a clinical/research setting associated with the University of Sao Paulo obesity clinic.
- Randomized and controlled study design.

## Protocol

- Treadmill HIT.
- Modality: Walking/running on treadmill.
- Work intervals: 60 seconds at 100% of peak velocity.
- Recovery: 3 minutes active recovery at 50% of exercise velocity.
- Sets or repetitions: 3 to 6 efforts.
- Intensity: 100% of peak velocity from maximal graded cardiorespiratory test.
- Session duration: Approximately 9 to 21 minutes including active recoveries, depending on 3 to 6 bouts; about 70% less time than ET.
- Frequency: 2 sessions per week on alternate days.
- Program length: 12 weeks.
- Progression: Added one bout every three weeks; maximal graded test repeated after 6 weeks to adjust intensity.
- Continuous endurance training.
- Modality: Walking/running on treadmill.
- Work intervals: Continuous exercise.
- Sets or repetitions: One continuous bout.
- Intensity: 80% of peak heart rate.
- Session duration: 30 minutes initially, increasing by 10 minutes every three weeks to 60 minutes during weeks 10-12.
- Frequency: 2 sessions per week on alternate days.
- Program length: 12 weeks.
- Progression: Duration increased by 10 minutes every three weeks.

## Outcomes

### Aerobic fitness
Status: improved
Absolute and relative VO2peak increased significantly in both ET and HIT, with similar response patterns.

Absolute VO2peak: ET +26.0%, HIT +19.0%; relative VO2peak: ET +13.1%, HIT +14.6%; within-group p<0.05 in figures/table ranking.

### Exercise test performance
Status: improved
Total exercise time and peak velocity improved across interventions.

Total exercise time: ET +19.5%, HIT +16.4%; peak velocity: ET +16.9%, HIT +13.4%.

### Insulin resistance markers
Status: improved
Insulinemia and HOMA-index were significantly lower after both ET and HIT.

Insulinemia: ET -29.4%, p=0.008; HIT -30.5%, p=0.010. HOMA-index: ET -42.8%, p=0.006; HIT -37.0%, p=0.002.

### Body mass and BMI
Status: mixed
BMI decreased significantly in both groups; body mass decreased significantly only in the HIT group; fat mass measures did not significantly change.

BMI: ET p=0.003, HIT p=0.0001. Body mass: HIT p=0.030; ET p=0.600. Fat mass percentage non-significant in both groups.

### Blood pressure
Status: mixed
Systolic blood pressure decreased significantly within the HIT group but not ET; DBP did not significantly change in either group.

HIT SBP 115 (10) to 106 (10), p=0.020, ES=-0.896; ET SBP p=0.400. DBP ET p=0.140; HIT p=0.330.

### Safety
Status: no clear change
No clinical evidence of excessive exhaustion, pain, osteoarticular injury, muscle soreness, or other adverse event was noticed.

## Practical Insights

- For obese children under supervision, treadmill HIT can produce similar short-term aerobic and insulin-sensitivity benefits to longer endurance training.
- A 1 minute hard / 3 minute active recovery format can be progressed by adding bouts every three weeks.
- Time efficiency does not mean lower monitoring needs; this study used clinical screening, supervised treadmills, HR monitoring, and weekly medical checks.

## Limitations

- No non-exercise control group.
- Small analyzed sample of 15 per group.
- Short-term 12 week intervention with no long-term safety or efficacy follow-up.
- No dietetic prescription or psychological therapy, limiting conclusions about multidisciplinary obesity treatment.
- Treadmill and maximal testing requirements limit direct translation to app-based bodyweight HIIT.

## Safety And Adherence

- Weekly medical examination found no clinical evidence of excessive exhaustion, pain, osteoarticular injury, muscle soreness, or any other adverse event.

## Original Sources

- [PubMed](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22880097/) (pubmed)
- [DOI](https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042747) (doi)
- [PMC full text](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3412799/) (full text)

## Agent Guidance

Preserve the paper-level scope of this note. Do not generalize beyond the population, protocol, measured outcomes, and limitations above.